Name Time Behind 1. 2 Anonymous Racing II Graph Analysis 2:38 +0:00
2 Anonymous Racing II won the race 0:19 ahead of 10 Bolo city regaz riders. The estimated timeloss for Anonymous Racing II was 0:00.
Anonymous Racing II was in contact with 10 Bolo city regaz riders (2nd) for 9 controls (1 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 1st for leg 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Best race position 1st at control 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Grouping 5 runners 10 Bolo city regaz riders (9 controls): 1st (4 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (-4 s) , 4th (-7 s) , 5th (-11 s) , 6th (-12 s) , 7th (-14 s) , 8th (-19 s) , 9th (-19 s) , 1st (3 s) , 2nd (-4 s) , 3rd (-9 s) , 4th (-11 s) , 5th (-16 s) , 6th (-19 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (-11 s) , 3rd (-16 s) , 4th (-19 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (-15 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (-14 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 1st place lost 0:00, gives 2:38 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 1st place PI 120.2 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 1st place PI 109.1 % Average performance PI of 117.8% consistency 15.3 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 105.9 %, 118.3 %, 118.8 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 112.9 %, 119.5 %, 117.6 %
2. 10 Bolo city regaz riders Graph Analysis 2:57 +0:19
10 Bolo city regaz riders finished 2nd, 0:19 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for Bolo city regaz riders was 0:00.
Bolo city regaz riders was in contact with 20 Big Brothers (3rd) for 9 controls (0 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 1st for leg 1 Best race position 1st at control 1, 2 Grouping 5 runners 20 Big Brothers (9 controls): 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (-4 s) , 3rd (-5 s) , 4th (-4 s) , 5th (-5 s) , 6th (-7 s) , 7th (-9 s) , 8th (-8 s) , 9th (-8 s) , 1st (-3 s) , 2nd (-11 s) , 3rd (-12 s) , 4th (-12 s) , 5th (-15 s) , 6th (-15 s) , 7th (-16 s) , 8th (-14 s) , 9th (-15 s) , 1st (-4 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (4 s) , 4th (7 s) , 5th (11 s) , 6th (12 s) , 7th (14 s) , 8th (19 s) , 9th (19 s) , 1st (-5 s) , 2nd (-15 s) , 1st (-6 s) , 2nd (-14 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 2nd place lost 0:00, gives 2:57 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 2nd place PI 106.1 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 2nd place PI 97.9 % Average performance PI of 102.1% consistency 10.2 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 108.9 %, 96.3 %, 104.3 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 107.5 %, 100.5 %, 98.8 %
3. 20 Big Brothers Graph Analysis 3:05 +0:27
20 Big Brothers finished 3rd, 0:27 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for Big Brothers was 0:00.
Big Brothers was in contact with 10 Bolo city regaz riders (2nd) for 9 controls (9 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 2nd for leg 1, 4, 9 Best race position 2nd at control 1 Grouping 5 runners 10 Bolo city regaz riders (9 controls): 1st (1 s) , 2nd (4 s) , 3rd (5 s) , 4th (4 s) , 5th (5 s) , 6th (7 s) , 7th (9 s) , 8th (8 s) , 9th (8 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (-7 s) , 3rd (-7 s) , 4th (-8 s) , 5th (-10 s) , 6th (-8 s) , 7th (-7 s) , 8th (-6 s) , 9th (-7 s) , 1st (-3 s) , 2nd (4 s) , 3rd (9 s) , 4th (11 s) , 5th (16 s) , 6th (19 s) , 1st (-4 s) , 2nd (-11 s) , 3rd (-19 s) , 1st (-5 s) , 2nd (-10 s) , 3rd (-16 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 3rd place lost 0:00, gives 3:05 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 3rd place PI 100.8 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 3rd place PI 93.2 % Average performance PI of 98.8% consistency 8.9 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 95.6 %, 101.0 %, 99.2 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 101.4 %, 100.5 %, 93.2 %
4. 13 MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI Graph Analysis 3:12 +0:34
13 MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI finished 4th, 0:34 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI was 0:00.
MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI was in contact with 10 Bolo city regaz riders (2nd) for 9 controls (9 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 2nd for leg 6, 8 Best race position 3rd at control 1 Grouping 10 runners 10 Bolo city regaz riders (9 controls): 1st (3 s) , 2nd (11 s) , 3rd (12 s) , 4th (12 s) , 5th (15 s) , 6th (15 s) , 7th (16 s) , 8th (14 s) , 9th (15 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (7 s) , 3rd (7 s) , 4th (8 s) , 5th (10 s) , 6th (8 s) , 7th (7 s) , 8th (6 s) , 9th (7 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (11 s) , 3rd (16 s) , 4th (19 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (-4 s) , 3rd (-12 s) , 4th (-14 s) , 1st (-3 s) , 2nd (-3 s) , 3rd (-9 s) , 4th (-15 s) , 5th (-15 s) , 6th (-18 s) , 1st (-8 s) , 2nd (-17 s) , 1st (-9 s) , 2nd (-15 s) , 1st (-9 s) , 2nd (-18 s) , 1st (-10 s) , 2nd (-15 s) , 3rd (-19 s) , 1st (-11 s) , 2nd (-18 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 4th place lost 0:00, gives 3:12 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 4th place PI 99.8 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 4th place PI 89.8 % Average performance PI of 97.5% consistency 12.7 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 95.6 %, 101.0 %, 92.9 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 93.9 %, 94.0 %, 98.8 %
5. 8 Frecce Bianche Graph Analysis 3:41 +1:03
8 Frecce Bianche finished 5th, 1:03 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for Frecce Bianche was 0:00.
Frecce Bianche was in contact with 7 FANTE CAVALLO E RE (6th) for 9 controls (2 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 4th for leg 2, 5 Best race position 5th at control 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Grouping 10 runners 10 Bolo city regaz riders (2 controls): 1st (6 s) , 2nd (14 s) , 1st (5 s) , 2nd (10 s) , 3rd (16 s) , 1st (3 s) , 2nd (3 s) , 3rd (9 s) , 4th (15 s) , 5th (15 s) , 6th (18 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (14 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (-1 s) , 3rd (-3 s) , 4th (1 s) , 5th (-6 s) , 6th (-6 s) , 7th (-4 s) , 8th (-1 s) , 9th (-1 s) , 1st (-5 s) , 2nd (-14 s) , 3rd (-20 s) , 1st (-6 s) , 2nd (-12 s) , 3rd (-18 s) , 4th (-17 s) , 5th (-20 s) , 1st (-6 s) , 2nd (-15 s) , 1st (-7 s) , 2nd (-12 s) , 3rd (-10 s) , 4th (-8 s) , 5th (-9 s) , 6th (-8 s) , 7th (-5 s) , 8th (-2 s) , 9th (-1 s) , 1st (-8 s) , 2nd (-15 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 6th place lost 0:00, gives 3:41 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 7th place PI 85.7 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 7th place PI 74.5 % Average performance PI of 81.5% consistency 9.5 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 76.9 %, 76.7 %, 88.1 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 85.8 %, 83.4 %, 77.2 %
6. 7 FANTE CAVALLO E RE Graph Analysis 3:42 +1:04
7 FANTE CAVALLO E RE finished 6th, 1:04 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for FANTE CAVALLO E RE was 0:00.
FANTE CAVALLO E RE was in contact with 8 Frecce Bianche (5th) for 9 controls (7 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 5th for leg 1, 4, 8 Best race position 5th at control 1, 4 Grouping 12 runners 10 Bolo city regaz riders (2 controls): 1st (5 s) , 2nd (15 s) , 1st (4 s) , 2nd (11 s) , 3rd (19 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (4 s) , 3rd (12 s) , 4th (14 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (15 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (1 s) , 3rd (3 s) , 4th (-1 s) , 5th (6 s) , 6th (6 s) , 7th (4 s) , 8th (1 s) , 9th (1 s) , 1st (-6 s) , 2nd (-13 s) , 3rd (-17 s) , 1st (-7 s) , 2nd (-20 s) , 1st (-7 s) , 2nd (-11 s) , 3rd (-15 s) , 4th (-18 s) , 5th (-14 s) , 6th (-19 s) , 1st (-7 s) , 2nd (-14 s) , 1st (-8 s) , 2nd (-11 s) , 3rd (-7 s) , 4th (-9 s) , 5th (-3 s) , 6th (-2 s) , 7th (-1 s) , 8th (-1 s) , 9th (0 s) , 1st (-9 s) , 2nd (-14 s) , 1st (-11 s) , 2nd (-20 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 7th place lost 0:00, gives 3:42 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 6th place PI 85.8 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 5th place PI 77.3 % Average performance PI of 81.5% consistency 8.3 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 81.7 %, 88.1 %, 80.5 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 83.4 %, 78.9 %, 83.7 %
6. 3 CoMiCo 168 Graph Analysis 3:42 +1:04
3 CoMiCo 168 finished 6th, 1:04 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for CoMiCo 168 was 0:09. Without the three biggest mistakes a 5th place would have been possible.
CoMiCo 168 was in contact with 7 FANTE CAVALLO E RE (6th) for 9 controls (8 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:09 8 seconds (leg 1) Best leg position 2nd for leg 9 Best race position 6th at control 9 Grouping 11 runners 13 MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI (3 controls): 1st (10 s) , 2nd (15 s) , 3rd (19 s) , 1st (8 s) , 2nd (11 s) , 3rd (7 s) , 4th (9 s) , 5th (3 s) , 6th (2 s) , 7th (1 s) , 8th (1 s) , 9th (0 s) , 1st (7 s) , 2nd (12 s) , 3rd (10 s) , 4th (8 s) , 5th (9 s) , 6th (8 s) , 7th (5 s) , 8th (2 s) , 9th (1 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (-2 s) , 3rd (-10 s) , 4th (-18 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (-9 s) , 3rd (-14 s) , 4th (-18 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (-8 s) , 4th (-9 s) , 5th (-11 s) , 6th (-17 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (-3 s) , 3rd (-19 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (-3 s) , 3rd (-15 s) , 4th (-17 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (-13 s) , 1st (-3 s) , 2nd (-9 s) , 1st (-4 s) , 2nd (-13 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 5th place lost 0:09, gives 3:33 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 5th place PI 86.2 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 6th place PI 74.6 % Average performance PI of 88.1% consistency 9.0 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 74.0 %, 84.5 %, 85.2 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 78.2 %, 85.0 %, 88.2 %
8. 4 VoltaRen Graph Analysis 4:11 +1:33
4 VoltaRen finished 8th, 1:33 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for VoltaRen was 0:07. Removing the biggest mistakes would not have improved the position from 8th.
VoltaRen was in contact with 12 AndrEma in bici (10th) for 9 controls (3 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:07 6 seconds (leg 2) Best leg position 1st for leg 9 Best race position 8th at control 1, 8, 9 Grouping 9 runners 7 FANTE CAVALLO E RE (2 controls): 1st (7 s) , 2nd (20 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (7 s) , 3rd (4 s) , 4th (0 s) , 5th (-4 s) , 6th (-7 s) , 7th (-7 s) , 8th (-13 s) , 9th (-17 s) , 1st (0 s) , 2nd (9 s) , 3rd (6 s) , 4th (9 s) , 5th (11 s) , 6th (7 s) , 7th (5 s) , 8th (-2 s) , 9th (-8 s) , 1st (0 s) , 2nd (6 s) , 3rd (-5 s) , 4th (-4 s) , 5th (-9 s) , 6th (-11 s) , 7th (-9 s) , 8th (-13 s) , 9th (-18 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (9 s) , 3rd (14 s) , 4th (18 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (6 s) , 3rd (-1 s) , 4th (1 s) , 5th (-1 s) , 6th (-4 s) , 7th (-3 s) , 8th (-13 s) , 9th (-17 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (-4 s) , 3rd (-17 s) , 1st (-4 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (-9 s) , 4th (-10 s) , 5th (-17 s) , 7th (-20 s) , 1st (-5 s) , 2nd (-4 s) , 3rd (-9 s) , 4th (-7 s) , 5th (-12 s) , 6th (-12 s) , 7th (-12 s) , 8th (-18 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 8th place lost 0:07, gives 4:04 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 8th place PI NaN % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 8th place PI 65.7 % Average performance PI of 75.7% consistency NaN % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs NaN %, 72.6 %, 73.5 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 69.7 %, 73.7 %, NaN %
9. 19 Kayak Team Turbigo Graph Analysis 4:19 +1:41
19 Kayak Team Turbigo finished 9th, 1:41 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for Kayak Team Turbigo was 0:00.
Kayak Team Turbigo was in contact with 12 AndrEma in bici (10th) for 9 controls (1 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 7th for leg 4, 5 Best race position 7th at control 2 Grouping 11 runners 13 MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI (2 controls): 1st (9 s) , 2nd (15 s) , 1st (7 s) , 2nd (11 s) , 3rd (15 s) , 4th (18 s) , 5th (14 s) , 6th (19 s) , 1st (6 s) , 2nd (12 s) , 3rd (18 s) , 4th (17 s) , 5th (20 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (-2 s) , 3rd (-2 s) , 4th (-9 s) , 5th (-15 s) , 6th (-14 s) , 7th (-12 s) , 8th (-11 s) , 9th (-9 s) , 1st (0 s) , 2nd (-9 s) , 3rd (-6 s) , 4th (-9 s) , 5th (-11 s) , 6th (-7 s) , 7th (-5 s) , 8th (2 s) , 9th (8 s) , 1st (0 s) , 2nd (-3 s) , 3rd (-11 s) , 4th (-13 s) , 5th (-20 s) , 6th (-18 s) , 7th (-14 s) , 8th (-11 s) , 9th (-10 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (8 s) , 4th (9 s) , 5th (11 s) , 6th (17 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (-3 s) , 3rd (-7 s) , 4th (-8 s) , 5th (-12 s) , 6th (-11 s) , 7th (-8 s) , 8th (-11 s) , 9th (-9 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (-13 s) , 1st (-4 s) , 2nd (-9 s) , 3rd (-15 s) , 4th (-19 s) , 1st (-5 s) , 2nd (-13 s) , 3rd (-15 s) , 4th (-16 s) , 6th (-19 s) , 7th (-17 s) , 8th (-16 s) , 9th (-15 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 9th place lost 0:00, gives 4:19 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 9th place PI 73.4 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 13th place PI 58.5 % Average performance PI of 64.5% consistency 12.5 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 58.5 %, 67.9 %, 78.0 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 73.1 %, 80.4 %, 60.2 %
10. 16 Spokojno kolesarstvo Graph Analysis 4:28 +1:50
16 Spokojno kolesarstvo finished 10th, 1:50 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for Spokojno kolesarstvo was 0:00.
Spokojno kolesarstvo was in contact with 12 AndrEma in bici (10th) for 9 controls (3 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 6th for leg 9 Best race position 9th at control 4 Grouping 11 runners 13 MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI (2 controls): 1st (11 s) , 2nd (18 s) , 1st (9 s) , 2nd (14 s) , 1st (8 s) , 2nd (15 s) , 1st (3 s) , 2nd (1 s) , 3rd (5 s) , 4th (-1 s) , 5th (-3 s) , 6th (-3 s) , 7th (-4 s) , 8th (0 s) , 9th (0 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (-6 s) , 3rd (1 s) , 4th (-1 s) , 5th (1 s) , 6th (4 s) , 7th (3 s) , 8th (13 s) , 9th (17 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (3 s) , 3rd (7 s) , 4th (8 s) , 5th (12 s) , 6th (11 s) , 7th (8 s) , 8th (11 s) , 9th (9 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (-4 s) , 4th (-5 s) , 5th (-8 s) , 6th (-7 s) , 7th (-6 s) , 8th (0 s) , 9th (-1 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (3 s) , 3rd (15 s) , 4th (17 s) , 1st (0 s) , 2nd (-10 s) , 3rd (-16 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (-6 s) , 3rd (-8 s) , 4th (-11 s) , 5th (-16 s) , 6th (-17 s) , 7th (-17 s) , 1st (-3 s) , 2nd (-10 s) , 3rd (-8 s) , 4th (-8 s) , 5th (-11 s) , 6th (-8 s) , 7th (-9 s) , 8th (-5 s) , 9th (-6 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 11th place lost 0:00, gives 4:28 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 10th place PI 71.6 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 12th place PI 59.8 % Average performance PI of 66.5% consistency 6.7 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 62.2 %, 63.7 %, 73.0 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 69.1 %, 73.7 %, 62.5 %
10. 12 AndrEma in bici Graph Analysis 4:28 +1:50
12 AndrEma in bici finished 10th, 1:50 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for AndrEma in bici was 0:00.
AndrEma in bici was in contact with 4 VoltaRen (8th) for 9 controls (5 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 6th for leg 9 Best race position 7th at control 1 Grouping 11 runners 13 MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI (2 controls): 1st (8 s) , 2nd (17 s) , 1st (6 s) , 2nd (13 s) , 3rd (17 s) , 1st (5 s) , 2nd (14 s) , 3rd (20 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (-7 s) , 3rd (-4 s) , 4th (0 s) , 5th (4 s) , 6th (7 s) , 7th (7 s) , 8th (13 s) , 9th (17 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (2 s) , 3rd (2 s) , 4th (9 s) , 5th (15 s) , 6th (14 s) , 7th (12 s) , 8th (11 s) , 9th (9 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (-1 s) , 3rd (-9 s) , 4th (-4 s) , 5th (-5 s) , 6th (-4 s) , 7th (-2 s) , 8th (0 s) , 9th (-1 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (2 s) , 3rd (10 s) , 4th (18 s) , 1st (-3 s) , 2nd (-1 s) , 3rd (-5 s) , 4th (1 s) , 5th (3 s) , 6th (3 s) , 7th (4 s) , 8th (0 s) , 9th (0 s) , 1st (-3 s) , 2nd (-11 s) , 1st (-5 s) , 2nd (-7 s) , 3rd (-13 s) , 4th (-10 s) , 5th (-13 s) , 6th (-14 s) , 7th (-13 s) , 1st (-6 s) , 2nd (-11 s) , 3rd (-13 s) , 4th (-7 s) , 5th (-8 s) , 6th (-5 s) , 7th (-5 s) , 8th (-5 s) , 9th (-6 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 11th place lost 0:00, gives 4:28 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 12th place PI 70.4 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 10th place PI 60.5 % Average performance PI of 66.2% consistency 5.8 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 64.3 %, 61.8 %, 73.0 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 71.9 %, 65.0 %, 65.0 %
12. 18 FINALLYFREE Graph Analysis 4:29 +1:51
18 FINALLYFREE finished 12th, 1:51 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for FINALLYFREE was 0:00.
FINALLYFREE was in contact with 12 AndrEma in bici (10th) for 9 controls (8 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 7th for leg 7 Best race position 8th at control 1 Grouping 11 runners 13 MAGNAGATI E TUTI MATI (2 controls): 1st (9 s) , 2nd (18 s) , 1st (7 s) , 2nd (14 s) , 1st (6 s) , 2nd (15 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (1 s) , 3rd (9 s) , 4th (4 s) , 5th (5 s) , 6th (4 s) , 7th (2 s) , 8th (0 s) , 9th (1 s) , 1st (0 s) , 2nd (-6 s) , 3rd (5 s) , 4th (4 s) , 5th (9 s) , 6th (11 s) , 7th (9 s) , 8th (13 s) , 9th (18 s) , 1st (0 s) , 2nd (3 s) , 3rd (11 s) , 4th (13 s) , 5th (20 s) , 6th (18 s) , 7th (14 s) , 8th (11 s) , 9th (10 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (3 s) , 3rd (19 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (4 s) , 4th (5 s) , 5th (8 s) , 6th (7 s) , 7th (6 s) , 8th (0 s) , 9th (1 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (-10 s) , 3rd (-12 s) , 4th (-18 s) , 1st (-4 s) , 2nd (-6 s) , 3rd (-4 s) , 4th (-6 s) , 5th (-8 s) , 6th (-10 s) , 7th (-11 s) , 1st (-5 s) , 2nd (-10 s) , 3rd (-4 s) , 4th (-3 s) , 5th (-3 s) , 6th (-1 s) , 7th (-3 s) , 8th (-5 s) , 9th (-5 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 13th place lost 0:00, gives 4:29 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 11th place PI 71.1 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 9th place PI 61.8 % Average performance PI of 67.8% consistency 7.9 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 65.3 %, 69.0 %, 68.6 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 67.1 %, 69.1 %, 68.6 %
13. 14 I TRICICLI Graph Analysis 4:34 +1:56
14 I TRICICLI finished 13th, 1:56 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for I TRICICLI was 0:08. Without the three biggest mistakes a 10th place would have been possible.
I TRICICLI was in contact with 12 AndrEma in bici (10th) for 9 controls (9 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:08 7 seconds (leg 1) Best leg position 8th for leg 4, 6 Best race position 13th at control 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Grouping 8 runners 12 AndrEma in bici (9 controls): 1st (6 s) , 2nd (11 s) , 3rd (13 s) , 4th (7 s) , 5th (8 s) , 6th (5 s) , 7th (5 s) , 8th (5 s) , 9th (6 s) , 1st (5 s) , 2nd (4 s) , 3rd (9 s) , 4th (7 s) , 5th (12 s) , 6th (12 s) , 7th (12 s) , 8th (18 s) , 1st (5 s) , 2nd (13 s) , 3rd (15 s) , 4th (16 s) , 6th (19 s) , 7th (17 s) , 8th (16 s) , 9th (15 s) , 1st (5 s) , 2nd (10 s) , 3rd (4 s) , 4th (3 s) , 5th (3 s) , 6th (1 s) , 7th (3 s) , 8th (5 s) , 9th (5 s) , 1st (4 s) , 2nd (13 s) , 1st (3 s) , 2nd (10 s) , 3rd (8 s) , 4th (8 s) , 5th (11 s) , 6th (8 s) , 7th (9 s) , 8th (5 s) , 9th (6 s) , 1st (3 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (-8 s) , 4th (-15 s) , 5th (-20 s) , 8th (-20 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (4 s) , 3rd (0 s) , 4th (-3 s) , 5th (-5 s) , 6th (-9 s) , 7th (-8 s) , 8th (-18 s) , 9th (-18 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 10th place lost 0:08, gives 4:26 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 13th place PI 69.5 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 11th place PI 60.4 % Average performance PI of 68.3% consistency 8.6 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 60.3 %, 67.9 %, 69.1 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 65.1 %, 70.2 %, 66.8 %
14. 11 turisti un po' agonisti Graph Analysis 4:52 +2:14
11 turisti un po' agonisti finished 14th, 2:14 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for turisti un po' agonisti was 0:08. Removing the biggest mistakes would not have improved the position from 14th.
turisti un po' agonisti was in contact with 14 I TRICICLI (13th) for 9 controls (6 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:08 7 seconds (leg 8) Best leg position 8th for leg 7 Best race position 12th at control 2 Grouping 9 runners 7 FANTE CAVALLO E RE (2 controls): 1st (11 s) , 2nd (20 s) , 1st (5 s) , 2nd (7 s) , 3rd (13 s) , 4th (10 s) , 5th (13 s) , 6th (14 s) , 7th (13 s) , 1st (4 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (9 s) , 4th (10 s) , 5th (17 s) , 7th (20 s) , 1st (4 s) , 2nd (9 s) , 3rd (15 s) , 4th (19 s) , 1st (4 s) , 2nd (6 s) , 3rd (4 s) , 4th (6 s) , 5th (8 s) , 6th (10 s) , 7th (11 s) , 1st (3 s) , 2nd (9 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (6 s) , 3rd (8 s) , 4th (11 s) , 5th (16 s) , 6th (17 s) , 7th (17 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (-4 s) , 3rd (-8 s) , 4th (-12 s) , 5th (-15 s) , 6th (-16 s) , 8th (-2 s) , 9th (-3 s) , 1st (-1 s) , 2nd (-4 s) , 3rd (0 s) , 4th (3 s) , 5th (5 s) , 6th (9 s) , 7th (8 s) , 8th (18 s) , 9th (18 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 14th place lost 0:08, gives 4:44 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 14th place PI 66.5 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 14th place PI 53.9 % Average performance PI of 62.4% consistency 7.8 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 58.5 %, 55.9 %, 67.7 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 65.1 %, 65.0 %, 56.8 %
15. 6 Nolers Graph Analysis 4:55 +2:17
6 Nolers finished 15th, 2:17 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for Nolers was 0:00.
Nolers was in contact with 11 turisti un po' agonisti (14th) for 8 controls (7 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:00 Best leg position 7th for leg 8 Best race position 12th at control 1 Grouping 8 runners 12 AndrEma in bici (2 controls): 1st (3 s) , 2nd (11 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (4 s) , 3rd (17 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (13 s) , 1st (2 s) , 2nd (10 s) , 3rd (12 s) , 4th (18 s) , 1st (1 s) , 2nd (13 s) , 1st (0 s) , 2nd (10 s) , 3rd (16 s) , 1st (-2 s) , 2nd (4 s) , 3rd (8 s) , 4th (12 s) , 5th (15 s) , 6th (16 s) , 8th (2 s) , 9th (3 s) , 1st (-3 s) , 2nd (0 s) , 3rd (8 s) , 4th (15 s) , 5th (20 s) , 8th (20 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 15th place lost 0:00, gives 4:55 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 15th place PI 64.3 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 15th place PI 53.0 % Average performance PI of 57.8% consistency 11.6 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 54.4 %, 70.2 %, 62.3 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 61.5 %, 58.9 %, 65.9 %
16. 5 SOPRAVIVAIO Graph Analysis 6:39 +4:01
5 SOPRAVIVAIO finished 16th, 4:01 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for SOPRAVIVAIO was 0:25. Removing the biggest mistakes would not have improved the position from 16th.
SOPRAVIVAIO was in contact with 15 MURATABOY (17th) for 7 controls (2 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:25 14 seconds (leg 8) Best leg position 14th for leg 1 Best race position 14th at control 1 Grouping 1 runners 15 MURATABOY (7 controls): 3rd (-17 s) , 4th (-15 s) , 5th (-6 s) , 6th (-2 s) , 7th (1 s) , 8th (1 s) , 9th (-1 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 17th place lost 0:25, gives 6:14 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 17th place PI 48.6 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 16th place PI 41.0 % Average performance PI of 48.7% consistency 8.5 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 50.3 %, 39.8 %, 47.1 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 47.2 %, 48.0 %, 41.9 %
17. 15 MURATABOY Graph Analysis 6:40 +4:02
15 MURATABOY finished 17th, 4:02 behind 2 Anonymous Racing II. The estimated timeloss for MURATABOY was 0:43. Without the three biggest mistakes a 16th place would have been possible.
MURATABOY was in contact with 5 SOPRAVIVAIO (16th) for 7 controls (5 controls behind).
Estimated timeloss 0:43 24 seconds (leg 1) Best leg position 11th for leg 6 Best race position 16th at control 7, 8 Grouping 1 runners 5 SOPRAVIVAIO (7 controls): 3rd (17 s) , 4th (15 s) , 5th (6 s) , 6th (2 s) , 7th (-1 s) , 8th (-1 s) , 9th (1 s) , Mistake free race without 3 biggest mistakes 16th place lost 0:43, gives 5:57 Top part of performance Best 50% of legs 16th place PI 52.9 % Lowest level Worst 50% of legs 17th place PI 34.7 % Average performance PI of 46.6% consistency 14.3 % Leg length performance For short/medium/long legs 38.1 %, 40.6 %, 52.4 % Race development Performance for early/middle/last part 43.3 %, 54.6 %, 43.7 %